[Wheya]

This man speaks the truth...

Originally Posted by Mayn Rangers can be great 1v1 but most people dont spec that way, and believe it or not most people cant play ranger xD Reason behind that being ranger is only class they can play decently with.

[Vehl]

Originally Posted by Mayn Rangers can be great 1v1 but most people dont spec that way, and believe it or not most people cant play ranger xD

My sentiment exactly. Good rangers are those who know how to stay close to combat instead of running away to khitai when someone gets close to him. If you hear me Nazraime... haha


I didn't know ranger ever was challenging... more fun definetly but since 2008 ranger have always been king of kills.

[Touchii]

Originally Posted by Mayn Rangers can be great 1v1 but most people dont spec that way, and believe it or not most people cant play ranger xD Reason behind that being ranger is only class they can play decently with.

Good one

[darknessjw]

Originally Posted by Mayn Rangers can be great 1v1 but most people dont spec that way

Yeah, snap fingers and cloth may already die if they know what to do.

[Bendowill]

Ranger is a really great class 1vs1 if you know what you have to do, but not challenging vs cloth classes except sins- but I really love 1vs1 fights against tank classes because you have to concentrate much more in these fights, use your ccs carefully and watch the cc- resis. Fights agains DTs and Guards are most enjoying as ranger!!!

[jauertussen]

Carnage conc is biggest beast vs ranger.
somehow i hit ranger much harder then sins and casters. one ww and a bb and they have so low hp the only way to escape dead is to hug guard.

i wud say a ranger getting a carnage conc below 60% is imba.
a brute conc shud also have the same end resoult but takes abit longer.

think there is 2-3 rangers on fury where its 50-50= skilled players
so deffently a skill factor, like most els in pvp.

how is ranger vs bs btw?

[graverr]

Originally Posted by jauertussen Carnage conc is biggest beast vs ranger. somehow i hit ranger much harder then sins and casters. one ww and a bb and they have so low hp the only way to escape dead is to hug guard. i wud say a ranger getting a carnage conc below 60% is imba. a brute conc shud also have the same end resoult but takes abit longer. think there is 2-3 rangers on fury where its 50-50= skilled players so deffently a skill factor, like most els in pvp. how is ranger vs bs btw?

lol and more lol

.u ask people about how bs vs ranger is? yet you post like you know something about ranger and duels,or pvp

more lol pls

[Bonera]

good sin with avatar will pwn any ranger easy...
barbs have better surviavability in 1vs1 with ranger...coz their armour is better due to stregnth + health regen.
but ofcourse a lot depends on speccs as well...
ranger is not that imba as everyone thinks it is.
its a faceroll class when farming noobs in randome minis,thats all.
i started a number of threads on how to make ranger more chllanging class to play,but i guess fc will be buisy revamping other classes which is fair enough,but after that they really should look at ranger again.

P.S. TTS is a noob friendly ability which should be removed from the game.

[Bendowill]

Yeah, true true words- at least TTS should have a cast time. But Ranger is really strong in 1on1 and if you recognize Avatar of a sin soon enough you have a chance to kite and survive the time (and prevent the sin to be healed), which works pretty fine against "noob" sins and fails mostly against good ones :P

Vs. DW Barbs it's always a question of DMG and CC: Who deals more DMG and who prevents being CC'd better, but it won't be a long fight. Ranger has so many CC (I guess most CC of any class?), just wondering why most ranger are not using at least 3 of them...

[Shiwan]

Originally Posted by Yondaime not really , ranger in pvp gear>hox

If HoX has Phoenix Cloak ready Ranger doesn´t have any chance especially while HoX have feated From the Beyond (extra charges) that time is Ranger free prey for HoX