[Gomm-2]

The guild than in the other server had a bk and now take a bk again has t1+t3 buffs stack. Pls repair this bug.

P.D: sorry for my english xd

[belej]

Thanks for telling Gomm.
Oh god, stacked BK buffs again no :-O
Last time it took months to fix, killed minis and make people quit game! I'm really scared. Oh well, i like minies but i'll have to stop playing them again. Or maybe this time Funcom fix it fast, we'll see.

[Gomm-2]

First time i saw this bug fc needs a lot ot time for rapair it, but last time they were very fast, i hope this time they will be it again xd.

[Sheba]

HOW is it possible to screw this up time and time again... is funcom trying to tell us something? -.-

[kindofmagic]

deja vu

ill not wonder if after someone will loose siege without loosing Bk they will get even more % invuls

[Lloyd-mp]

I feel like it's not stacked, maybe it's visual bug? People are dying alot easier now than before when we all had T3 BKs, and they are supposed to die harder with T3 + T1 stacked.

[Chigo]

Originally Posted by Raxikk I feel like it's not stacked, maybe it's visual bug? People are dying alot easier now than before when we all had T3 BKs, and they are supposed to die harder with T3 + T1 stacked.

yeh i think its a visual bug too.

[Argantes]

Originally Posted by Raxikk I feel like it's not stacked, maybe it's visual bug? People are dying alot easier now than before when we all had T3 BKs, and they are supposed to die harder with T3 + T1 stacked.

i think it was only visual bug after the previous merge as well (cba searching for dev statement on forum atm), but it should be fixed anyway

[Chigo]

Originally Posted by Argantes i think it was only visual bug after the previous merge as well (cba searching for dev statement on forum atm), but it should be fixed anyway

well the original statement about stacked bk invuls (2008/2009) was that it was just visual bug too, but meh

[Argantes]

Originally Posted by Chigo well the original statement about stacked bk invuls (2008/2009) was that it was just visual bug too, but meh

was it? i thought that the statement from that era used to be "working as intended", but i might be wrong