[borystakieimie]

Originally Posted by Azanath1979 Because than people would have create a char there leveled to 30 used Offline levels maxed AA and transfered back to the original server they intented to stay anyway like Crom or Fury

I said "why not enable full aa working in pvp there" - it would work only there=at rage server, not at crom or fury. You would have to level your aa for pve at rage in the same way, the difference would be that while pvping everyone would have full aa at rage server.

[K4nnyc]

Ok it seems like the QA session has ended.

A BRIEF SUMMARY.

No pvp content until 2013 and that content may turn out to be just 1 mini game map.

I for one am looking forward to it!

:|

[Dualshocker]

Originally Posted by K4nnyc Ok it seems like the QA session has ended. A BRIEF SUMMARY. No pvp content until 2013 and that content may turn out to be just 1 mini game map. I for one am looking forward to it! :|

That makes me sad, well GW2 massive open PVP here I come

[Monkeyy]

Originally Posted by Mayn Making too many minigames would mean we would have shitloads of minigames and an endless wait for them as people are spread out in the signs ups.. one more minigame maybe.. but more than that and it starts to get bad imo. So stop asking for many more minigames all the time and show some world pvp love <3

In a way you are right but more minis give varity. People tend to pick the minis where most people are signed. And because most want tokens you end up getting all maps even if population is low.

[Monkeyy]

Originally Posted by K4nnyc Ok it seems like the QA session has ended. A BRIEF SUMMARY. No pvp content until 2013 and that content may turn out to be just 1 mini game map. I for one am looking forward to it! :|

AOC is on cooldown until buzz from GW2, diablo3 etc goes away. Then they mght have a chance since the graphics etc is pretty updated. And if they make a good effoer with pvp update.

[SecondSkin]

i see sum strange races at gw2 reminds me of wow/lineage..im affraid that something gonna be wrong there pretty soon lol ^^

Sil and co, give us peeveepee content pls..December 21/2012 is closer and closer..

[kindofmagic]

Originally Posted by K4nnyc Thats not what he means. Open world PvP needs factions. Fact. Open world PvP needs hardcore consequence system or it fails hard like AOC has. Fact. Minigames need spliting between levels or something similar to seperate bori queens from newbies. Fact. Alignment in this case means Good>neutral>Evil. Hardcore consequence is> fighting in wilderness away from guards = no bad rep, anything goes have fun, do it if you can get away with it! Ganking in sight of guards gives bad rep points, going over a certain threshold means you become evil and get instant guard agro and death on sight by guards. A outlaw city built on top of the bori fiasco where outlaws congregate and hero's hunt them down, the new "kesh oasis pvp point". This is self regulating pvp system where your actions have a cause and effect. Throw in 20 or so good/neutral/evil pvp quests and you are gold. All written in a hurry on scrap of paper in a chip shop, but better than anything FC have come up with in 4 years.

open world DONT NEED ANY FACTION!!! Even more good open world pvp means NO FACTION.

ffa pvp is best way for organizing world pvp, UO, EVE even LA2 showed how it works. Even in DF pvp motivation works good while any rvr game excpt maybe DAoK failed with open world pvp.

Your faction have to be your own choice - you can organize your guild or alliance or join someone's one or stay lone wolf but still you will have a choice to attack everyone(maybe with only 1 exception which is your guildamets but personally i prefer friendly fire mechanic).

[Misy]

Originally Posted by SecondSkin i see sum strange races at gw2 reminds me of wow/lineage..im affraid that something gonna be wrong there pretty soon lol ^^ Sil and co, give us peeveepee content pls..December 21/2012 is closer and closer..

Hello.

What do you mean exactaly about GW2?, Do you tested and dont liked?

About Aoc, i have lost hopes, i am not agree about thw way of the game, i cancelled. The time will see if Aoc has future, like game and with servers full of players.


Edit: @kindofmagic

Agree. And arenas, other thing that i dont undestand. That is very expensive in time and in resources.

The prety of Aoc is things like sieges, system criminal, and perhaps Bori if they change, the pvp resources if they give a valueble use in the crafting and in the system criminal etc, they can do a lot of things and nothing.

Eve, Ultima On line > Wow (grinding and lineal and instanced content, ****ing Wow)

[K4nnyc]

Originally Posted by gandalion AOC is on cooldown until buzz from GW2, diablo3 etc goes away. Then they mght have a chance since the graphics etc is pretty updated. And if they make a good effoer with pvp update.

A good effort with a pvp update In 2013! Its allready 3 years too late for a pvp update, next year it will be 4 years too late. We have super low population right now mate, next year will be even less people. I dont want to pvp vs my alts because nobody else is here...

They needed to take action YEARS ago. Now the game director says another year and possibly all they do is add a mini map? It's ridiculous.

[Kurt777]

Originally Posted by kindofmagic open world DONT NEED ANY FACTION!!! Even more good open world pvp means NO FACTION. ffa pvp is best way for organizing world pvp, UO, EVE even LA2 showed how it works. Even in DF pvp motivation works good while any rvr game excpt maybe DAoK failed with open world pvp. Your faction have to be your own choice - you can organize your guild or alliance or join someone's one or stay lone wolf but still you will have a choice to attack everyone(maybe with only 1 exception which is your guildamets but personally i prefer friendly fire mechanic).

I agree to some point, but the mix with questzones, open pvp and no working consequence system is not working. Factions where you can still attack everyone but with consequence would be my go.